Let us define time. Time is a basic component of the measuring system used to sequence events, to compare the durations of events and the intervals between them, and to quantify the motions of objects [Wikipedia].
In other words, time is a man-made system of measurement used to perceive and measure events and intervals between said events to establish a duration or ‘period of time.’
Using this notion, it is then reasonable to assume that humans can change or control time by altering their perception and durations of those events. The question is whether it is possible for the brain to consciously or sub-consciously achieve this task, ultimately controlling the speed at which a period of time occurs.
The answer is yes.
Do you ever wonder why people who fall off a tall structure (e.g. a bungee jumping platform) say that their entire life “flashed before [their] eyes” when in reality the fall started and ended in only a few seconds? To us observers, it seems impossible for someone to reflect upon their whole life in such a short period of ‘time’, but believe it or not, the victim of the fall is likely telling the truth.
Why is this?
At the moment of the fall, time was perceived to be moving faster for the victim than it was for the observer. The victim’s brain was able to take in and process much more information in the same period of time than the observer was able to.
* For the purpose of this example, the observer is anyone on the ground that is not affected by the fall; whether they actually observed the fall is irrelevant and the ‘observer’ is simply being used for the basis of comparison.
This is also why people who are involved in accidents can often describe what happened in great detail in what seems to be ‘super-slow motion,’ or the reason why one can remember the look on people’s faces in a room during an embarrassing or frightening situation. This is result of the victim being able to take in and process everything that is happening at extremely fast speeds relative to their observing counterparts.
But there is still an unanswered question, why does time move faster for the victim? Why is it that the victim can process more information than the observer over the same period of time?
The answer is this: When certain chemicals flood the body (such as adrenaline), the brain starts to perceive time at a different speed than its observing counterpart. This allows the brain to think more ‘quickly’ as if a two second fall was actually occurring over several seconds or maybe even minutes, much like how high-speed slow-motion cameras are used to represent a quick event over a long period of time.
Scientific study: Scientists from Duke University recently designed and performed an experiment which provided conclusive evidence to support this theory of time perception. In the experiment, several lab mice were trained to operate a lever at exactly 12 seconds after a timer started in order to receive a food reward.
Under normal conditions, all the lab mice were able to execute this task flawlessly. However when one of the mice was given a dose of cocaine, it began to perceive time as moving much faster relative to the control mouse. In fact, the mouse then tried the experiment and operated the lever at only 8 seconds, 4 seconds quicker than the normal time period.
When a mouse was placed under the influence of marijuana however, it perceived time slower and didn’t operate the lever until 16 seconds into the experiment, 4 seconds after the normal time period.
In actuality, the movie “The Matrix” is a lot more real than it seems. We have the ability to control and speed up time using emotions to trigger a chemical flow of adrenaline so the brain is able to process and act on a given situation much quicker (e.g. in a fight or life threatening scenario). Learning to control the chemical flow is learning to control time.
Thus it is my belief that improving reaction time is actually the skill of learning to speed up time so the brain can realize a stimulus earlier, rather than just training the eye to be more sensitive to movement. I also maintain a hypothesis that people who possess a so called ‘eidetic memory’ (a very rare ability, also loosely termed ‘photographic memory’) live in a state where time is almost always perceived faster than people around them, allowing them to walk by a painting and remember it as if they studied it for minutes at a time.
Final thoughts: Yes, the pot will take longer to boil if you watch it. Your brain will become docile and inactive while waiting, resulting in time (as defined earlier) being slowed down relative to those around you. While you wait (for what seems to be an eternity) for the water to boil, your friend who is talking on the phone probably did not even notice you left the room.
Very interesting, Benjamin.
(I am a reader of your GMnews blog, and I just thought I’d check this out.)
–Conman124
Well not necessarily, if I were to suppose that you are in front of a moving bullet, time does not slow down for you, your perception of time slows down, even so, you can’t move in time since the bullet is faster. So the pot doesn’t really take longer to boil if you watch it, you just get lazy waiting for it.
That is if we take time as an independent system and not affected or caused by our perception.
But wouldn’t it be cool if we could always use this high-sensitive-slow-mo mode?
Correct me if I’m wrong.
Here is an experiment that contradicts your conclusion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG6nZY9Bxy0
Participants were dropped from a large height (into a net) and asked to read a clock that changed faster than the eye could register. The participants were not able to read the clock.
In addition, if we view time as the fourth dimension, then its duration is as measurable as your height or the distance between New York and Chicago. All objects moving through time might appear as “a long, undulating snake” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU1fixMAObI) . If so, a “period of time” could be quantitatively measured.
@Quertyman, you failed to mention the fact that in both cases the participant was able to read the first (of two numbers) correctly and give a number that looked similar to the second number.
Edit: I saw a different video documentary on the same experiment, and it showed how participants were able to identify the first number with absolute certainty, and got close at identifying the second number.
The chances of this happening by guessing are outrageously small.
Here is the actual paper based off that experiment. The actual percentage of those able to read the chronometer did not correspond statistically to expected predictions. Instead, “[their] findings suggest that time-slowing is a function of recollection, not perception: a richer encoding of memory may cause a salient event to appear, retrospectively, as though it lasted longer.”
I disagree when you say time is merely a measurement used by people to record sequences of events. There is proof that time is a separate entity, because we know that objects (and people) can travel along it at different rates. There have been experiments with atomic clocks, where one has been subjected to extreme gravity or velocity, and another left still, and the one subjected to force reads a slightly less time than the other, proving that you can travel through time faster than another person.
However, this means that time travel must be possible, and therefore paradoxes must be possible, which is impossible, and about here is where I start getting all confused and decide to stop typing before I make a complete fool out of myself
wow, so being able to be like a real time lord is really possible, sweet.
or does it?
Im testing it Right now
to see if its TRUE or NOT
or is it??….
this is a bunch of bullshit you cant control time by changing your chemical reaction. if this was the case you would be able to survive snake bites and other poisons the block your adrenalin if your wondering if it takes longer for the water to boil if you watch it it dosent. its like asking if paint will dry slower if i watch it the awnser is no it takes the same amount of time for both thank you very much